John Eastman, a College of Colorado Boulder visiting conservative thought and coverage scholar, speaks about his plans to sue the college at a information convention exterior CU Boulder on Thursday, April 29, 2021.
Andy Cross | The Denver Submit | Getty Pictures
A lawyer who pushed to overturn the then president’s 2020 election defeat Donald Trump invoked his Fifth Modification proper in opposition to self-incrimination in refusing to reply questions throughout an look Wednesday earlier than a grand jury in Georgia, his legal professionals mentioned.
John Eastman sought safety beneath attorney-client privilege, refusing to reply at the very least a few of the questions that have been put to him earlier than the grand jury, which was convened as a part of it. A criminal investigation Presumably unlawful interference in Georgia’s presidential election contestHis legal professionals mentioned.
Eastman is One of Trump’s group of allies These have been introduced by the panel that’s listening to testimony in Atlanta. One other of these associates, Trump’s former personal lawyer Rudy Giulianihas been made a goal in that investigation and lately testified earlier than the identical grand jury.
Eastman wrote a collection of memos after the 2020 election calling out then-Vice President Mike Pence To successfully return the president Joe Biden’s victory by refusing to certify the outcomes of the Electoral School.
“At his look earlier than the Fulton County Particular Grand Jury, we urge our consumer John Eastman to claim the lawyer consumer privilege and the constitutional proper to stay silent the place acceptable,” Eastman’s attorneys, Charles Burnham and Harvey Silverglate, mentioned in a press release. had suggested.”
“Out of respect for the confidentiality of the grand jury, we won’t disclose the questions or the substance of the testimony. We need to thank the grand jury for his or her service,” the attorneys mentioned.
The assertion additionally drew Fulton County District Lawyer Fannie Willis for investigation.
“By all indications, the district lawyer’s workplace has set itself on an unprecedented path of criminalizing controversial or unapproved authorized rules, presumably hoping that the federal authorities will paved the way,” the legal professionals mentioned. mentioned
“Criminalizing unpopular authorized rules goes in opposition to each American custom and can finish the careers of John Adams, Ruth Ginsburg, Thurgood Marshall and plenty of different well-known American legal professionals,” the assertion mentioned. John Adams was the second president of the US, whereas Ginsburg and Marshall have been Supreme Court docket justices who helped set new authorized precedents with their work throughout the civil rights motion.
“We name on all observers of any political persuasion to affix us in condemning this troubling growth,” Burnham and Silverglate wrote.
Eastman revealed final month that his cellular phone had been seized by federal brokers who stopped him in New Mexico, forcing him to unlock it.
The seizure was made as a part of an investigation by the Justice Division’s inner watchdog, the Workplace of the Inspector Normal.
The IG’s workplace is investigating the function of the Justice Division and its elements in making ready for and responding to the riot by Trump supporters on the US Capitol “on January 6, 2021,” in keeping with the workplace’s web site. The riot got here as a joint session of Congress, chaired by Pence, was convened to certify Biden’s victory.
Jeffrey Clark, a former Justice Division official, seized electronics from his Virginia house the identical day Eastman’s cellphone was seized.
Clark additionally supported Trump’s efforts to overturn the election.
Trump thought of putting in Clark as lawyer common within the days main as much as Jan. 6, 2021, however a bunch of prime justice officers mentioned they might resign in protest if that occurred, abandoning the thought.